Here Are The Worst Range Rover Years to Avoid and Why

Patrick Oziegbe
Updated On:

Are you in the market for a luxury SUV? If so, consider a Range Rover.

But before you purchase, there’s one crucial step you need to complete: research. Knowing which years to avoid can save you from headaches and costly repairs.

Lucky for you, we’ve done the digging for you. In this article, we’ll reveal the Range Rover years that have proven to be less reliable, so you can make an informed decision and drive off with confidence in your dream car.

Do Range Rovers have a lot of problems?

Range Rover Years to Avoid

In this section, we’ll discuss some of the Range Rover years known for having issues that should be avoided if you’re considering purchasing a used one.

2001 – P38 Model

The 2001 Range Rover, part of the P38 model line, is known for its power, durability, and reliability.

However, it has been reported to have certain problems, such as air suspension issues, which can lead to the vehicle sagging to one side after about six to ten years.

Consider this if you’re considering a 2001 Range Rover, as you might spend more on repairs.

2009 – LR3 Model

The 2009 Range Rover LR3 model also deserves mention, as it has been flagged in some online discussions with reliability concerns.

While specific information is limited, it’s still an important year to be cautious about when considering a used Range Rover.

2012-2013 Models

The 2012 and 2013 Range Rovers have yet to be rated highly regarding reliability.

While some Consumer Reports suggest that these years offer below-average reliability, it’s important to note that these ratings can vary depending on the specific vehicle’s condition and maintenance history.

Inspect any 2012 or 2013 Range Rover carefully and verify its maintenance records before purchasing.

2017 and 2018 Models

The 2017 and 2018 Range Rover models are relatively recent but have already displayed some concerns about reliability.

Some experts suggest even a lightly used 2014 model can bring potential issues to your wallet regarding repairs.

This information should prompt you to approach any used 2017 or 2018 models with caution, as they could also present significant repair costs in the future.

Common Problems

Here are some common issues associated with various Range Rover years that you should remember when choosing your vehicle.

Air Suspension Issues

Air suspension has been a standard feature on all Range Rover SUVs since the early 1990s. It offers an improved ride, adjustable ground clearance, and a comfortable driving experience.

However, the air suspension system has its drawbacks. With time, typically around six to ten years, you may face problems, such as a sagging suspension, causing your vehicle to tilt to one side.

To avoid facing these issues, be sure to inspect and maintain the air suspension system regularly.

Electrical Problems

Range Rovers from certain years, particularly 2006 to 2008 and 2014, have been known to experience electrical issues.

These problems can prove troublesome and affect various aspects of the vehicle, including the lighting system, power windows, and infotainment system.

To prevent inconvenience and possible safety hazards, it’s important that you perform regular maintenance checks and promptly address any electrical problems.

Mechanical Issues

While Range Rovers are generally known for their reliability, some years, such as 2003 and 2004, have had mechanical issues. Common mechanical problems to look out for include:

  • Power loss in diesel models due to blocked EGR or DPF valves or split hoses.
  • Steering problems are caused by low tire pressure, a damaged steering rack, a low-power steering fluid, or a damaged power steering belt.

Being aware of these frequent mechanical issues and conducting regular maintenance checks will help you keep your Range Rover running smoothly and prevent costly repairs.

RELATED: Discover specific Range Rover Velar problems to avoid and why!

Range Rover Reliability by Year to Purchase

Are you looking to know the best Range Rover reliability by year to buy? One of the most popular and reliable models is the 2001 Range Rover.

This year is known for its power, durability, and dependability, essential when purchasing a used vehicle.

Before finalizing your decision, assess your budget, vehicle mileage, and condition.

Additionally, consider the vehicle’s features, such as its engine size, transmission, and drivetrain.

Generations of Range Rovers

Second Generation – P38

The second generation Range Rover, the P38, was produced between 1994 and 2002. This luxurious off-road vehicle offered better engine options, upgraded suspension, and revamped interior and exterior designs.

However, the P38 faced some reliability issues due to its complex air suspension system and electronic components.

If you are looking for a vintage Range Rover, you must be mindful of these potential problems and invest in proper maintenance.

Third Generation – L322

The third-generation Range Rover, the L322, was produced between 2002 and 2012. This generation introduced further refinements in design, technology, and driveability.

Nonetheless, certain model years, such as 2003, 2004, and 2006-2008, experienced setbacks in terms of reliability.

During these years, potential issues included faulty air suspensions, failing electronic components, and costly maintenance. Do thorough research, and ensure you get a well-maintained example if you opt for the L322 generation.

Fifth Generation – L405

The present-day Range Rover finds itself in its fifth generation, named L405.

From its launch in 2013, the modern iteration has seen multiple updates and improvements, culminating in the highly-rated 2019-onwards models.

Despite marked progress in reliability and performance compared to previous generations, some years within the L405 generation – particularly 2014 – still need to be more desirable due to ongoing reliability concerns.

Range Rover Sport Models

Let’s also discuss the issues with some Range Rover Sport models, focusing on the 2nd generation Range Rover Sport.

The worst Range Rovers to avoid are 2014, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2004, and 2003 model years. While the 2nd generation Range Rover Sport was introduced in 2013, the 2014 model year showed some common issues.

One of the main concerns with the 2014 Range Rover Sport is its reliability. This model is known for having mechanical issues and breakdowns, which may be hard for you as an owner.

It is important to note that not all 2nd generation Range Rover Sport models are problematic.

In some model years, they gained a better reputation, with improvements in overall reliability. For instance, after the 2014 model year, Land Rover made significant changes to ensure better reliability and performance.

While considering various models, always remember to:

  • Check the maintenance history and records of the vehicle
  • Take the car for a thorough test drive
  • Obtain a pre-purchase inspection from a trusted mechanic

Range Rover Competitors

When considering a Range Rover, it’s also essential to know about its competitors in the market. This section will discuss five popular alternatives to the Range Rover: Audi Q7, BMW X5, Acura RDX, Lexus RX 350, and Infiniti QX60.

Audi Q7

The Audi Q7 is a luxury SUV with impressive interior and cutting-edge technology features.

Compared to the Range Rover, the Q7 offers more seating capacity with a standard third row, making it a better option for larger families.

However, one key issue with the Audi Q7 is its higher maintenance cost compared to other luxury SUVs.

BMW X5

As one of the Range Rover’s closest competitors, the BMW X5 offers an excellent blend of performance, comfort, and style.

The X5 has an extensive list of standard features and agile handling that outperforms the Range Rover. However, some BMW X5 owners have reported concerns about the BMW X5 vehicle’s reliability, especially in the long run.

Acura RDX

The Acura RDX is a smaller luxury SUV that offers a more budget-friendly option compared to the Range Rover without compromising on features or performance.

Despite its lower price tag, the RDX comes with a spacious interior and a long list of standard safety technology, among other RDX reliable features.

A key issue with the Acura RDX is its turbo lag, which can negatively impact driving performance.

Lexus RX 350

The Lexus RX 350 could be an excellent alternative to the Range Rover for those seeking a reliable luxury SUV.

The RX 350 is well-known for its industry-leading reliability and comfortable ride, making it a solid choice for long-term ownership.

However, the Lexus RX 350 may need more off-road capabilities that make the Range Rover a popular choice.

Infiniti QX60

Lastly, the Infiniti QX60 is another SUV that provides a more budget-conscious option in the luxury market.

The QX60 offers a spacious interior and a comfortable ride, making it suitable for families prioritizing practicality and comfort over outright performance.

On the downside, the Infiniti QX60 needs to improve in terms of advanced technology features compared to its competitors, including the Range Rover.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

GMC Savana years to avoid

What’s Wrong With The GMC Savana Years to Avoid & Long Can it Last Compared with Others?

Now you are ready to invest in a used GMC Savana and wondering – what year and model is worth it for me? What you really want is to purchase a van that deliver overall
Which is Biggest SUV of Subaru

When Can You Buy a 2023 Subaru Ascent?

The 2023 Subaru Ascent is an exciting addition to the Subaru lineup, offering a refreshed design and myriad features that cater to families and adventurers alike. With its spacious interior, increased fuel efficiency, and enhanced

Do Subarus or Toyotas Last Longer? Read This Simple Comparison!

Two brands often come to mind when choosing a reliable vehicle: Subaru and Toyota. Both brands have reputations for building high-quality, durable, and long-lasting vehicles that cater to families and commuters alike. There has always been a

SUBSCRIBE TODAY

Sign up now to get the email newsletter and exclusive deals weekly.